Cookie alert!

Utilizamos cookies para optimizar tu experiencia utilizando nuestra plataforma.

Para conocer más sobre nuestra política de privacidad, haga click aquí.

Al usar este sitio, usted acepta nuestro uso de cookies.

Aceptar

Accede a tu red social favorita o tu e-mail, para que podamos notificarte cuando el informe esté listo.

No, gracias

GoodVibes

Únete al movimiento

Ranking GoodVibes: Protectores Solares Kids & Babies

¡Conoce todo sobre él!

Actualizado: 11-11-22. Total productos analizados: 29. En base a la selección de productos enviados por integrantes del movimiento GoodVibes.

PosiciónProductoPuntaje
1Medihealth Umbrella Kids FPS 509.0
2Mustela Very High Protection Sun Lotion – SPF 50+8.8
3Coppertone Waterbabies Pure & Simple Protector solar en loción, SPF 508.5
4Fotoprotector ISDIN Fusion Fluid Mineral Baby Pediatrics SPF 50+8.4
5Cetaphil sun kids loción liposomal FPS 50+7.9
6Nivea Sun Kids Protector Solar Hidratante FPS 507.8
7La Roche-Posay Anthelios 50+ Shaka fluido com cor7.8
8Eucerin Sun Kids Spray FPS 50+7.7
9Dermaglos PROTECTOR SOLAR BEBÉS con FPS 657.5
10Avène Spray SPF +50 Niños7.5
11La roche posay ANTHELIOS DP LOCIÓN FPS 50+ PANTALLA SOLAR PARA NIÑOS7.3
12NIVEA Kids spray solar para niños SPF-50+ extra resistente al agua spray7.3
13NIVEA BLOQUEADOR SOLAR FPS 60 SENSITIVE PROTECT & PLAY7.3
14Vichy Protector Solar Niños Idéal Soleil Spray7.3
15Rayito De Sol Protector Solar Kids Fps65 Pediatric7.3
16Caviahue Protector Solar FPS70 Pediatrico7.2
17La Roche-Posay Anthelios Dermo-Pedriatrics +50SPF7.2
18DERMAGLOS PROTECTOR SOLAR NINOS F507.1
19Rayito de Sol FPS 50 Kids Spray Solar7.0
20DELIAL Sensitive Advanced Niños Bruma Anti-Arena IP50+6.6
21PROTETOR SOLAR FACIAL ANTIOLEOSIDADE LA ROCHE-POSAY ANTHELIOS AIRLICIUM FPS 30 50G6.6
22ANTHELIOS XL PROTECT PROTETOR SOLAR FLUIDO FPS70 120ML6.5
23Rayito de Sol Pediatric 60 Protector solar mousse6.5
24ISDIN FOTO PEDIATRIC FUSION WATER SPF506.4
25DELIAL Sensitive Advanced leche solar Niños SPF-50+6.1
26La Roche-Posay ANTHELIOS XL GEL-CREMA TOQUE SECO FPS 50+5.7
27Hawaiian Tropic Baby5.6
28Hawaiian Tropic Kids SPF50 UVA/UVB5.4

¿Tu protector favorito no está en el ranking? Envíanos una foto de tu producto por instagram (goodvibesmovement.in) o a team@goodvibesmovement.in, y lo analizaremos para vos.

El Ranking GoodVibes es elaborado considerando el riesgo potencial para la salud y el ambiente de los ingredientes de cada producto en base a la última evidencia científica disponible.

El análisis de ingredientes ha sido elaborado por investigadores del CONICET (*) en base a las siguientes referencias bibliográficas:

Cosmetic Ingredient Review (CIR) 2020. CIR Assessments.
EC (Environment Canada). 2008. Domestic Substances List Categorization. Canadian Environmental Protection Act (CEPA) Environmental Registry.
Japan Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. Standards for Cosmetics (2006).
Berardesca E, et al., J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2019
33(7):25-33.
Berardesca, E., T. Zuberbier, M. Sanchez Viera, and M. Marinovich. Review of the safety of octocrylene used as an ultraviolet filter in cosmetics. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology 33 (2019): 25-33.
http://www.safecosmetics.org/get-the-facts/chemicals-of-concern/homosalate/. Insufficient data to make a “generally recognized as safe and effective” (US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Sunscreen drug products for over-the-counter human use: proposed rule. Fed Regist. 2019
84(38):6204-6275. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2019-2-26/pdf/2019-3019.pdf. Accessed April 1, 2019).
European Commission Legislation (Regulation (EC) N° 1223/2009 y 2019/831, Annexes I to VI and all the amendments to the cosmetics regulation).
California Department of Public Health – California Safe Cosmetics Program, August 2016.
SCCP (2006) Opinion on Benzophenone-3. European Commission – The Scientific Committee on Cosmetic Products and Non-Food Products Intended for Consumers. SCCP/1069/06 Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/health/ph_risk/committees/04_sccp/sccp_opinions_en.htm.
List of Safe and/or Natural Ingredients
Final Report on the Safety Assessment of Propylene Glycol and Polypropylene Glycols. (1994). Journal of the American College of Toxicology, 13(6), 437–491.
US – FOOD & DRUG Administration (FDA). Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) Substances (SCOGS) Database (SCOGS Number 27,1973. Conclusion 1)
Material Safety Data Sheet MSDS# 96171
Chasset, F., Soria, A., Moguelet, P., Mathian, A., Auger, Y., François, C., and Barete, S. (2015). Contact dermatitis due to ultrasound gel: A case report and published work review. The Journal of dermatology.
Bohn, S., and Bircher, A. J. (2001). Phenoxyethanol induced urticaria. Allergy, 56(9), 922-923.
CIR (Cosmetic Ingredient Review). Safety Assessment of Acrylates Copolymers as Used in Cosmetics (2018).
Rillig, M. C., et al. (2019). Microplastic effects on plants. New Phytologist, 223(3), 1066-1070.
Sussarellu, R., et al. (2016). Oyster reproduction is affected by exposure to polystyrene microplastics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(9), 2430-2435.
K. Aschenbeck, E. Warshaw. Allergenic Ingredients in Facial Wet Wipes. Dermatitis (2017) 28(6):353–359
A. C. de Groot, H. L. M. van der Meeren, J. Willem Weyland. Contact Dermatitis (1988) 19: 77-78
Cosmetic Ingredient Review (CIR)
Final Report of the Amended Safety Assessment (2004). International Journal of Toxicology, 23 (2), 55–94.
SCCNFP (The Scientific Committee on Cosmetic Products and Non-Food Products Intended for Consumers) 1999. Opinion concerning fragrance allergy in consumers. A review of the problem. Analysis of the need for appropriate consumer information and identification of consumer allergens. SCCNFP/0017/98 Final. December 199 – Tatyana Hamilton and Gillian C de Gannes. 2011. Allergic contact dermatitis to preservatives and fragrances in cosmetics. Skin therapy letter 16(4), 1-4 .- Anne Birgitte Simonsen, Mette Deleuran, Jeanne Duus Johansen and Mette Sommerlund 2011. Contact allergy and allergic contact dermatitis in children – a review of current data. Contact dermatitis 65(5), 254-65.
European Chemical Agency (ECHA)
CIR (Cosmetic Ingredient Review). CIR Compendium, containing abstracts, discussions, and conclusions of CIR cosmetic ingredient safety assessments (Washington DC, 2006).
CowanEllsberry, C.E., Dyer, S.D., Erhardt, S., Bernhard, M.J., Roe, A.L., Dowty, M.E., Weisbrod, A.V., 2008. Approach for extrapolating in vitro metabolism data to refine bioconcentration factor estimates. Chemosphere 70, 180-1817. Dyer, S.D., Bernhard, M.J., CowanEllsberry, C., Perdu-Durand, E., Demmerle, S., Cravedi, J.-P., 2008. In vitro biotransformation of surfactants in fish. Part I: Linear alkylbenzene sulfonate (C12-LAS) and alcohol ethoxylate (C13EO8). Chemosphere 72, 850-862. Peter Fisk Associates Limited (2012) Position paper: Bioaccumulation of Aliphatic Alcohols in the context of REACH registration. Reference: PFA.197.18.02. Date: 10 August 2012.
Lanigan RS, Yamarik TA. Int J Toxicol. 2002, 21 Suppl 2:95‐142.
Orenstein, A., Kostenich, G., Tsur, H., Roitman, L., Ehrenberg, B., & Malik, Z. (1995) in Photodynamic therapy of cancer II (Vol. 2325, pp. 100-105). International Society for Optics and Photonics.
Bråred Christensson J, Andersen KE, Bruze M, et al. Contact Dermatitis. 2012,67(5):247-259.


(*) Según el ranking SCImago 2020, el CONICET alcanza la segunda posición entre las instituciones académicas y de investigación más prestigiosas de América Latina. A nivel mundial, ocupa la posición 230 entre 7000 instituciones privadas y gubernamentales.

Tu mensaje no será publicado